How Small Betrayals Drain People Power

When safety is offered in exchange for someone else’s freedom, refusal is the first act of solidarity.

Early 2023, after Roe’s collapse turned her state into a legal minefield.

A close childhood friend, pregnant, panicking, asked me to help her “find a way.” We talked through the cumbersome processes, forwarding addresses, protocols and safety checklists. I kept my voice steady so she could borrow the calm.

Months later—same chat thread, full of photos of our children and memories across decades of friendship—she wrote:

“I’ve voted for Trump. My son ships out in June.
Kamala’s anti-military. And you know I’m a cop.”

I told her Kamala was a former prosecutor and Trump’s own top brass from his first administration called him a national security threat.

I reminded her the option she’d recently so desperately needed was disappearing because of the judges Trump installed.

I reminded her that the war drums he’s beating could land on her son’s back.

She answered:

“The military and police are more important than access to abortion. I did what was right for my family, just as you did.”

We have not spoken since.

One vote, one friendship, traded for the promise of belonging to the armed half of the state.

Her son’s body on the line for a war she helped green-light.

My autonomy—our autonomy—treated as collateral.

Small betrayal, global consequence.

That’s authoritarianism’s favorite currency: ordinary people cashing in someone else’s freedom for a little borrowed armor.

---

The Deal We Keep Making

It’s easy to imagine authoritarianism as something that comes from above—an iron fist, the sound of marching boots. But the truth is quieter, sadder, closer to home. It arrives in whispered bargains and familiar smiles, in the small, silent decisions we make each day, hoping they’ll keep the worst consequences safely distant.

It works because it makes an offer that feels impossible to refuse:

“Stay loyal, stay quiet, and I’ll keep you safe.”

That’s the lie: safety, for you and those you love, as long as you don’t ask who’s left outside. And once you accept that first small comfort, the next compromise feels natural, inevitable even.

Loyalty: Our Hearts as Hostages

Loyalty is more powerful than force. It becomes a currency: a test we can pass again and again, reassuring ourselves that we belong. It’s the nod you give, the uniform you defend, the vote you cast—not because you fully believe, but because the price of dissent is loneliness. It’s fear disguised as belonging, conformity dressed as comfort.

For my friend, loyalty meant protecting a uniform and a job title she held dear. It meant pretending her own body’s safety, her own choice, was secondary, disposable. It meant pretending her vote was just politics, not a personal betrayal.

Hierarchy: Buying a Better Place in Line

We learn young that the world stacks people up: by race, by gender, by money, by what uniform they wear. And we figure out quickly it’s better to be halfway up that ladder than at the bottom. It’s better to step on someone else than be stepped on yourself.

This was the hidden contract my friend signed. Protect the ladder. Protect the system that hands out safety and comfort and dignity—sparingly, selectively—to those who promise never to question it. Her son’s safety, her own autonomy, these became negotiable. Not because she didn’t care, but because the hierarchy promised her just enough protection to make those sacrifices seem worthwhile.

Comfort: The Cost of Our Silence

Comfort doesn’t mean luxury, it often just means relief. The relief of waking up knowing today you’re not the target. The relief of imagining your child safely inside a uniform, protected from the pain you see inflicted on others.

But comfort demands silence. It demands that you stop noticing when people around you start disappearing. It demands you stop feeling outrage, replacing it with quiet justifications:

“It’s not my fault. I didn’t make the rules. It’s just the way things are.”

Comfort, in the end, is the anesthesia that lets us accept cruelty. It lets us close our eyes to the suffering we choose not to see. And eventually, the anesthesia wears off—often too late.

The Slow, Quiet Violence of Consent

This is how authoritarianism survives. Not because it crushes us, but because it invites us in, makes us comfortable, offers us a better seat as long as we look away.

My friend wasn’t overtly cruel. She didn’t set out to betray anyone. She simply made a calculation that millions have made before her: that her loyalty would be rewarded, that her silence would protect her. She couldn’t yet see that the violence she accepted against others was violence she also accepted against herself and those she loved.

It’s the quietest violence. The one we consent to without ever feeling the blade.

This is the trade we keep making.
This is the bargain we must learn, finally, to refuse.

---

Breaking the Trade & Learning to Refuse

It’s tempting to believe we can step away from these bargains quietly. That we can remain safely neutral, tucked inside the comfort of silence. But history doesn’t give us that luxury. Because silence itself is a choice; an endorsement, a betrayal. To break the trade, we have to first confront what it means to truly refuse.

Refusal Starts Small, But It Starts Everywhere

Refusal doesn’t require heroics or martyrdom. It begins with honesty: first with yourself, then out loud to someone you trust, then louder still. It begins by admitting that the comfort you’ve been sold was never free; that it came at someone else’s expense, and someday it will come for you.

Refusal is the moment you choose clarity over comfort.
It’s when you say, quietly but clearly:

“I see what I’ve been offered, and I see what it costs—and I can’t pay that price anymore.”

Breaking Ranks, Breaking Silence

It feels risky, because it is risky. To break ranks is to lose status, to invite exile, to make the tribe uncomfortable. Yet this is exactly what authoritarian structures fear most: not our anger, but our willingness to sacrifice the small comforts of complicity.

History keeps the receipts:

• Nelson Mandela – born to Xhosa aristocracy, he became a “class traitor” when he walked away from privilege to fight apartheid.

• Dietrich Bonhoeffer – Lutheran pastor destined for quiet academia, he “betrayed” the Nazi-controlled church and joined the underground.

• Daniel Ellsberg – Pentagon insider who risked prison to leak the truth about Vietnam.

• Harriet Tubman – escaped slavery, then kept returning south, “stealing” the “property” the system insisted she still was.

Each of them surrendered a safety net the hierarchy offered, and in doing so yanked a thread that helped unravel it. Their “treason” was loyalty redirected—from the system to the people the system devoured.

That’s why regimes crumble when the people meant to enforce them begin to question what they’ve been asked to uphold. Small refusals by soldiers who put down their weapons, by police who refuse unlawful orders, by parents who refuse to send their children to war—carry a power no authoritarian can fully control.

“I Won’t Trade You In”

If authoritarianism’s currency is betrayal, resistance is built from solidarity—authentic, fierce, and unapologetic. It’s built from refusing to see another person’s suffering as acceptable collateral damage for your own security. It’s built from understanding that the hierarchies we’ve upheld were designed to divide us, to ensure we fear losing more than we dream of gaining.

Resistance says:

“I won’t trade you in—not for power, not for comfort, not for safety. Not even for peace.”

And the moment enough people say it, out loud, at the same time, something powerful begins to happen: the hierarchy starts to shake. The system falters. The structure built on countless small betrayals begins to collapse, one refusal at a time.

Choosing Each Other Over Comfort

My friend traded our friendship for a sense of security that will never truly protect her. Her story is personal, but it’s also universal. We all face the temptation to sacrifice others for our own safety, believing it’s the only way to survive.

But survival alone is never enough. We deserve more—we deserve dignity, autonomy, and freedom. We deserve relationships and communities that don’t demand silence as the price of belonging.

We deserve solidarity that can’t be bought or sold.

Refusal as Hope

Every refusal cracks open the possibility for others to refuse as well. Every person who breaks rank creates space for someone else to imagine a different way to live, a different world to build.

Refusal is hope made tangible—hope with teeth and muscle, hope grounded not in vague optimism but in clarity, courage, and a willingness to act.

And perhaps that’s the most radical truth of all:

We don’t resist simply to survive. We resist so that we can finally live, together, in dignity, in honesty, and in freedom.

---

The World We Refuse to Trade Away

There’s an old lie we’ve been taught: that we’re safer alone. That betrayal, silence, and complicity are the quiet tolls we pay to keep harm from knocking on our own door. But every choice we make to sacrifice someone else’s freedom for our own comfort only feeds the machine that eventually consumes us all.

Refusal is hard. Solidarity can feel dangerous. But if the alternative is a world built on fear, suspicion, and betrayal—a world built on endlessly trading one another away—then refusal is the only real choice we have left.

We must choose differently, not because it’s easy, but because the stakes are too high not to. The quiet betrayals add up. Because the friend you abandon today might be your only ally tomorrow. Because the uniform that promises protection will one day ask you to sacrifice everything.

But there’s something important we have to hold close: behind every badge, behind every uniform, behind every role they’ve convinced us to fear or obey—there’s a person.

A person who can say “no.” A person who can refuse to be a weapon against others. A person who can choose differently, just as we can.

Acknowledging the human behind every badge doesn’t mean erasing accountability, it means demanding it. Because being human means having the power to say no. And choosing not to say no, choosing not to refuse, is still a choice. They count on us forgetting that, hoping we’ll see each other only as symbols, threats, or tools. But remembering the humanity beneath the uniform, beneath the armor, beneath the mask, that’s how we begin to unravel the system they’ve built on our fear.

We don’t have to make these trades anymore.

We can refuse.

We can refuse loudly, together, until the system built on our silence crumbles beneath our voices. We can refuse until loyalty is no longer a weapon turned against us, until hierarchy no longer demands we pay in someone else’s pain.

We can refuse until the world we’re offered is finally one we don’t need to escape—one built on dignity, honesty, and the simple truth that we won’t leave each other behind.

This is the world worth building.
This is the future worth fighting for.

And it begins with one simple promise—first to ourselves, then to each other:

“I won’t trade you in.”

Not for comfort. Not for safety. Not ever again.

Solidarity isn’t a candlelit vigil. It’s a refusal that costs us something and saves something bigger.